Porównanie metod wyznaczania wydajności sieciowania makrocząsteczek z danych analizy żel-zol - komunikat szybkiego druku

A. Shyichuk; G. Tokaryk

Published : 2022-09-01

Vol. 50 No. 3 (2005)

A comparison of methods to determination of macromolecule crosslinking yield from gel fraction data - Rapid Communication

A. Shyichuk G. Tokaryk

Abstract

Three methods of linearization of sol-gel analysis data are considered. The commonly used Charlesby-Pinner (Ch-P) method often yields non-linear plots. The same data may easily be linearized by using the virtual dose concept proposed by Charlesby and Rosiak (Ch-R). Very good linear representation of the data is also obtained by plotting the sol content versus irradiation dose in the double natural logarithmic scale (LLS). All the three methods result in rather similar values of gel dose and scission-to-crosslinking ratio. At the same time, both Ch-R and LLS methods seem to be more accurate due to the higher values of the coefficients of linear correlation.

Keywords

sieciowanie radiacyjne ; analiza żel-zol ; komputerowa symulacja sieciowania ; przetwarzanie danych crosslinking by irradiation ; sol-gel analysis ; crosslinking computer simulation ; data treatment

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF

Zasady cytowania

Shyichuk, A., & Tokaryk, G. (2022). A comparison of methods to determination of macromolecule crosslinking yield from gel fraction data - Rapid Communication. Polimery, 50(3), 219–221. Retrieved from https://polimery.ichp.vot.pl/index.php/p/article/view/1712

References

Dahlan H. M., Khairul Zaman M. D., Ibrahim A.: Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2002, 64, 429.

2. Dadbin S., Frounchi M., Saeid M. H., Gangi F.: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 86, 1959.

3. Żuchowska D., Meissner N., Steller R.: Polimery 2003, 48, 620.

4. Żenkiewicz M.: Polimery 2003, 48, 667.

5. Czupryńska J.: Polimery 2002, 47, 8.

6. Rätzsch M., Arnold M., Borsig E., Bucka H., Reichelt N.: Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002, 27, 1195.

7. Wąsicki A.: Polimery 2001, 46, 414.

8. Uhniat M., Zemlak M., Kudła S.: Polimery 2003, 48, 816.

9. Jones R. A.: J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Edn. 1994, 32, 2049.

10. Forsythe J. S., Hill D. J. T., Whittaker A. K., Logothetis A. L.: Polym. Int. 1999, 48, 1004.

11. Kudła S.: Polimery 2002, 47, 762.

12. Charlesby A., Pinner S. H.: Proc. Royal Soc. A 1959, 249, 367.

13. Olejniczak J., Rosiak J., Charlesby A.: Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1991, 38, 113.

14. http://mitr.p.lodz.pl/biomat/gelsol.html

15. Shyichuk A., Shyichuk I.,Wu G., Katsumura Y.: J. Polym. Sci., A: Polym. Chem. 2001, 39, 1656.

16. Shyichuk A., Tokaryk G.: Macromol. Theory Simul. 2003, 12, 599.

17. Shyichuk A.: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 61, 1703.

Google Scholar

Citing articles via

Statistics

Total abstract views : 0

PDF Downloads : 0

A. Shyichuk polimery@ichp.pl

Affiliation
University of Technology and Agriculture, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, ul. Seminaryjna 3, 85-326 Bydgoszcz, Poland

G. Tokaryk

Affiliation
PreCarpathian University, Chemistry Department, Shevchenka 57, 76025 Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine