Niekonwencjonalne metody wtryskiwania

E. Bociąga

Published : 2022-09-01

Vol. 50 No. 1 (2005)

Nonconventional methods of injection molding

E. Bociąga

Abstract

Nonconventional methods of polymer injection molding allow to produce the parts showing properties and surface quality difficult or even impossible to obtain by the conventional injection molding process. These methods can be classified using different criteria, such as incorporation of additional materials or components into the molded part, melt formulation, melt manipulation, additional mold movement and special part or geometry features. Selected methods of nonconventional injection molding were described in the article. One of them is the microlayer injection molding, which enables to produce the parts consisting of a lot of very thin layers from at least two different polymers. Process of in-mold decoration is a combination of conventional injection molding and part printing. During in-mold lamination a multilayer laminate is positioned in a mold-parting plane and covered on one side by the injected polymer. Injection molding process can also be applied for metal-ceramic powders, mixed with thermoplastic and wax. By this method parts of good mechanical properties, complicated shape, made of almost unworkable materials, usually without additional machining can be manufactured. The push-pull process is characterized by the multiple polymer flow in cavity, in two directions, which causes significant macromolecule orientation in a core of parts and improves their mechanical properties in the flow direction. Multiple polymer flow in two directions lowers the possibility of weld lines appearance. During the rheomolding process a polymer melt, before its entering the mold or inside the mold, undergoes low frequency vibration to increase its rheological, mechanical and optic properties. Vibration reduces or even eliminates weld lines creation. Nonconventional methods of injection molding are performed using machines and equipment of more complicated constructions, their technologies are more difficult, but these methods allow to produce the products of specific properties required.

Keywords

proces wtryskiwania ; metody niekonwencjonalne ; klasyfikacja ; charakterystyka injection molding ; nonconventional methods ; classification ; characteristics

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Zasady cytowania

Bociąga, E. (2022). Nonconventional methods of injection molding. Polimery, 50(1), 10–19. Retrieved from https://polimery.ichp.vot.pl/index.php/p/article/view/1603

References

Pötsch G., MichaeliW.: „Injection Molding. An Introduction” Hanser Publishers, Monachium-Wiedeń-Nowy Jork, Hanser/Gardner Publications, Inc., Cincinnati 1995, str. 195.

2. Osswald T. A., Turng L-S., Gramann P. J.: „Injection Molding Handbook” Hanser Publishers, Monachium, Hanser Gardner Publications, Inc., Cincinnati 2001, str. 748.

3. Bürkle E.: „Procesy specjalne i kierunki rozwoju technologii wtrysku” w: „Technologie wtryskiwania, jakość i efektywność” Wyd. Plastech, Warszawa 2000, str. 17.

4. Zwierzyński A.: Mechanik 2000, 787.

5. Smorawiński A.: „Technologia wtrysku” WNT,Warszawa 1989, str. 460.

6. Sikora R.: „Przetwórstwo tworzyw wielkocząsteczkowych” WE, Warszawa 1993, str. 528.

7. Johannaber F.: a) „Kunststoffe Maschiner Führer” Carl Hanser Verlag, Monachium-Wiedeń 1992; b) „Wtryskarki — Poradnik użytkownika”, Wyd. Plastech, Warszawa 2000, str. 279.

8. Filarski R.: „Nowatorskie technologie wtryskiwania” w: „Technologie wtryskiwania, jakość i efektywność”, Wyd. Plastech, Warszawa 2000, str. 53.

9. Zawistowski H., Frenkler D.: „Konstrukcja form wtryskowych do tworzyw termoplastycznych”, WNT, Warszawa 1984, str. 393.

10. Steinbichler G.: „Nowa technologia spieniania drobnokomórkowego wyprasek — Mu-Cell” w: „Technologie wtryskiwania, jakooeæ i efektywnooeæ”, Wyd. Plastech, Warszawa 2000, str. 141.

11. Praca zbiorowa: „Konstrukcje z tworzyw sztucznych. Praktyczny poradnik. Zasady doboru materiałów”, Wyd. Alfa-Weka Sp. z o.o., Warszawa 1997.

12. Szostak M.: Plast. Rev. 2002, nr 8, 62.

13. Zawistowski H.: „Problemy klasyfikacji i terminologii metod dekorowania wyrobów w formie podczas procesu wtryskiwania” w: „Techniki barwienia, zdobienia i znakowania wyrobów z tworzyw sztucznych”, Wyd. Plastech, Warszawa 2002, str. 102.

14. Cippert P.: „Techniki zdobienia wyprasek w formie podczas procesu wtryskiwania” w [13], str. 105.

15. Molik M., Tryburcy J.: „Klasyfikacja technik zdobienia wyrobów z tworzyw sztucznych i kryteria ich wyboru” w [13], str. 122.

16. Kato K., Chung Y. H., Ohtake N.: „On the Defects of Voids and Rough Surface Asperity in Ceramic Injection Molding”, The Polymer Processing Society Fifteenth Annual Meeting (PPS-15), ‘s. Hertogenbosch 1999, str. 84.

17. Robles M., Vlachopoulos J., Hrymak A. N.: „Water Debinding in Powder Injection Molding”, The Polymer Processing Society Eighteenth Annual Meeting (PPS-18), Guimarães, str. 103.

18. Ludwig H-C, Kech A., Möginger B.: „Solidification in Push-Pull Processing—Simulation and Comparison to Morphology”, The Polymer Processing Society Fifteenth Annual Meeting (PPS-15), ‘s Hertogenbosch 1999, str. 88.

19. Tchalamov D. B., Custódio F. M., Viana J. C., Cunha A. M.: „Two-Material Push-Pull Processing of Low and High Molecular Weight Polypropylene”, The Polymer Processing Society Eighteenth Annual Meeting (PPS-18), Guimarães, str. 91.

Google Scholar

Citing articles via

Statistics

Total abstract views : 0

PDF Downloads : 0